Comentarii (247)
lavy_flavy
lavy_flavy  •  17 Iulie 2013, 18:37
Postat de teilandezu pe 17 Iulie 2013, 18:34

Turbatilor ! In loc sa va bucurati de victoria de aseara , pe voi va freaca grija de Rapid .

cam cum va freaca si pe voi de steaua,nu?

sadim3ro
sadim3ro  •  17 Iulie 2013, 18:36
Postat de vaalah pe 17 Iulie 2013, 18:34

A decision on the request for provisional measures will be issued before the start of the Romanian championship. ______ Nu au luat nicio decizie INCA cu privire la fond : barajul Rapid Concordia . Au dispus doar o masura provizorie ca Rapid sa joace cu Vaslui . Decizia finala se va lua in cateva zile . Cine a facut articol asta si-a batut joc de cititori .

Vaalahule nu stiu ce ai patit dar incepi sa fi simpatic... pai gsp isi bate joc de fiecare articol voit sau din incompetenta.

andy_s
andy_s  •  17 Iulie 2013, 18:36

Vestea asta este buna pentru mimi si ceilalti stelisti care se bucurau ca Rapid a retrogradat,taiati-va venele oitelor,degeaba aveti echipa daca voi sunteti niste nimicuri ,pentru noi sunteti decit niste oite care sunt acompaniate de crainicul stadionului,nimicuri in expansiune,Rapid NU MOARE! PENTRU MINE RAPID ESTE TOT CE AM IUBIT SI VOI IUBII PINA LA MOARTEEEEEEE! FZR

alpha.dog
alpha.dog  •  17 Iulie 2013, 18:35

stima si felicitari Rapid!

vaalah
vaalah  •  17 Iulie 2013, 18:34
Postat de vaalah pe 17 Iulie 2013, 18:33

Lausanne, 15 July 2013 - The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has registered an appeal filed by C.S. Concordia Chiajna against the Romanian Football Federation. Together with the appeal, C.S. Concordia Chiahna filed a request for a stay of the decision which allowed FC Rapid Bucaresti to play a game against the Appellant, the winning team being qualified for the next Liga 1 Championship. Chiajna, which was ranked 15 in the Romanian Liga 1 last season and was the best of the 4 teams relegated in Liga 2, alleges that FC Rapid Bucarest did not obtain the license to participate in the Liga 1 for the next season and that, therefore, no knock-out game was to be played. A decision on the req

A decision on the request for provisional measures will be issued before the start of the Romanian championship. ______ Nu au luat nicio decizie INCA cu privire la fond : barajul Rapid Concordia . Au dispus doar o masura provizorie ca Rapid sa joace cu Vaslui . Decizia finala se va lua in cateva zile . Cine a facut articol asta si-a batut joc de cititori .

teilandezu
teilandezu  •  17 Iulie 2013, 18:34

Turbatilor ! In loc sa va bucurati de victoria de aseara , pe voi va freaca grija de Rapid .

vandersaar
vandersaar  •  17 Iulie 2013, 18:33
Postat de vaalah pe 17 Iulie 2013, 18:33

Lausanne, 15 July 2013 - The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has registered an appeal filed by C.S. Concordia Chiajna against the Romanian Football Federation. Together with the appeal, C.S. Concordia Chiahna filed a request for a stay of the decision which allowed FC Rapid Bucaresti to play a game against the Appellant, the winning team being qualified for the next Liga 1 Championship. Chiajna, which was ranked 15 in the Romanian Liga 1 last season and was the best of the 4 teams relegated in Liga 2, alleges that FC Rapid Bucarest did not obtain the license to participate in the Liga 1 for the next season and that, therefore, no knock-out game was to be played. A decision on the req

Maine va fi trecuta pe site. Keep calm and...

crystyanbet
crystyanbet  •  17 Iulie 2013, 18:33

asa ca stelistilor mai spalati-va la bot

teo94_rapid
teo94_rapid  •  17 Iulie 2013, 18:33
Postat de cfr_atlanta pe 17 Iulie 2013, 18:12

Eu in locul celorlate 17 echipe nu as lua licenta pe viitor. Ce rost are?

Ce mai face Craciunescu? A venit vremea pentru un nou titlu?

vaalah
vaalah  •  17 Iulie 2013, 18:33

Lausanne, 15 July 2013 - The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has registered an appeal filed by C.S. Concordia Chiajna against the Romanian Football Federation. Together with the appeal, C.S. Concordia Chiahna filed a request for a stay of the decision which allowed FC Rapid Bucaresti to play a game against the Appellant, the winning team being qualified for the next Liga 1 Championship. Chiajna, which was ranked 15 in the Romanian Liga 1 last season and was the best of the 4 teams relegated in Liga 2, alleges that FC Rapid Bucarest did not obtain the license to participate in the Liga 1 for the next season and that, therefore, no knock-out game was to be played. A decision on the req

  • 1
  • •••
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • •••
  • 25
Comentează