Dumitru Dragomir anunţă vremuri grele pentru Steaua: "Din vară va începe dezastrul! Costel Gâlcă va pleca"

Fereasca Cel-de-Sus sa se transfere si Deaconu-Bricheta, cu gashka lui, la arabi!

zidane92 • 24 Martie 2015, 18:22

Îmi place

iN FOTBALUL CORUPT,CONDUS DE GRUPURI MAFIOATE DE INTERESE DE LA FRF SI LPF SI DE CASELE DE PARIURI ,E CLAR CA ACEST PERSONAJ CARE INTR-O TARA CINSTITA AR FI DE MULT LA MITITICA STIE CE ZICE REFERITOR LA FOTBALUL MIORITIC SI ASA VA FI ,DE LA ANUL FCSB VA FI ISTORIE,DE VAZUT CINE VA FI NOUA CAMPIOANA IN FOTBALUL BLATURILOR LA PARIURI,IN FOTBALUL ANTRENORILOR SCHIMBATI SI PUSI IN FUNCTIE DE JUCATORI,IN FOTBALUL INSOLVENTELOR,IN FOTBALUL PATRONILOR TEPARI,IN FOTBALUL UNOR FOTBALISTI DE NIVELUL SOMALIEI!

rangers94 • 24 Martie 2015, 18:19

Îmi place

Postat de xnread pe 24 Martie 2015, 18:16

..as far as we can see Reagan's "evil empire" remains very much alive :)

Oh yes !!!!!!!!!

xnread • 24 Martie 2015, 18:16

Îmi place

Postat de rangers94 pe 24 Martie 2015, 18:11

Russia'll be crushed , economic speaking , just like the great Mr. Ronald Regan did in the 1980s .

..as far as we can see Reagan's "evil empire" remains very much alive :)

rangers94 • 24 Martie 2015, 18:14

Îmi place

Postat de xnread pe 24 Martie 2015, 18:05

"Those problems, exacerbated by international sanctions, would look like child’s play if Russia were ever to tangle with a NATO country."

You have a link for that article ? Thx :))

rangers94 • 24 Martie 2015, 18:11

Îmi place

Postat de xnread pe 24 Martie 2015, 18:04

However, that will almost certainly be unnecessary. NATO’s ability to deter Russia comes far less from its specific military capabilities as it does from its actual existence. No matter how newly aggressive Russia may be — and the seizure of a weak, neighboring territory without firing a shot is not exactly probative — it would be suicidal for Russia to embark on a war with a vastly richer and more powerful adversary like NATO. Already, Russia is paying a serious price for seizing Crimea – tens of billions in capital outflows, a faltering stock market, potentially negative growth and political and economic isolation."

Russia'll be crushed , economic speaking , just like the great Mr. Ronald Regan did in the 1980s .

xnread • 24 Martie 2015, 18:05

Îmi place

Postat de xnread pe 24 Martie 2015, 18:04

However, that will almost certainly be unnecessary. NATO’s ability to deter Russia comes far less from its specific military capabilities as it does from its actual existence. No matter how newly aggressive Russia may be — and the seizure of a weak, neighboring territory without firing a shot is not exactly probative — it would be suicidal for Russia to embark on a war with a vastly richer and more powerful adversary like NATO. Already, Russia is paying a serious price for seizing Crimea – tens of billions in capital outflows, a faltering stock market, potentially negative growth and political and economic isolation."

"Those problems, exacerbated by international sanctions, would look like child’s play if Russia were ever to tangle with a NATO country."

xnread • 24 Martie 2015, 18:04

Îmi place

Postat de xnread pe 24 Martie 2015, 18:03

"To be sure, NATO has its share of issues — most glaringly large cuts in military spending by virtually all alliance members and a need for greater security cooperation. But it also features three countries (the United States, United Kingdom and France) that have among the six largest military budgets in the world; on the ground operational experience in Iraq and Afghanistan and a whole bunch of nuclear weapons. In all, NATO can field 2 million troops and, because of its exponentially larger economies than Russia, can mobilize and re-arm far more effectively and quickly than Moscow."

However, that will almost certainly be unnecessary. NATO’s ability to deter Russia comes far less from its specific military capabilities as it does from its actual existence. No matter how newly aggressive Russia may be — and the seizure of a weak, neighboring territory without firing a shot is not exactly probative — it would be suicidal for Russia to embark on a war with a vastly richer and more powerful adversary like NATO. Already, Russia is paying a serious price for seizing Crimea – tens of billions in capital outflows, a faltering stock market, potentially negative growth and political and economic isolation."

xnread • 24 Martie 2015, 18:03

Îmi place