Comentarii (70)
vali.gazzaev
vali.gazzaev  •  22 Februarie 2021, 16:43
Respect Raportează Răspunde

Intre cele 2 entități nu exista nicio legătură – doar o oarecare asemănare de nume deliberat produsă de Gigi Becali. În realitate, totul deosebea aceste două entități: – AFC Steaua era o ASOCIAȚIE NON-PROFIT, pe când SC FC Steaua este o SOCIETATE COMERCIALĂ‚. – AFC Steaua avea un Certificat de Identitate Sportivă (CIS) – un fel de act de naștere unic, individual și obligatoriu pentru orice entitate sportivă din România -, SC FC Steaua a obținut un alt CIS. Asta arată că nu vorbim de aceeași entitate sportivă. – AFC Steaua avea un număr de cont în bancă și un Cod Unic de Identificare (CUI) pentru tranzacțiile comerciale, pe când SC FC Steaua avea alt cont și alt CUI. – AFC Steaua administra un bun al statului, SC FC Steaua avea patron. Făcând o paralelă cu înlocuirea AFC Steaua de către SC FC Steaua, ar fi ca și cum, într-o zi, într-o clasă dintr-un liceu de elită elevul Ionică Popescu, un premiant blond și înalt, ar fi înlocuit de Georgică Popescu, un nou-venit care nu știe să citească, roșcat și scund. Iar directorul liceului, complice la această operațiune, ar motiva substituirea prin faptul că pe amândoi îi cheamă Popescu și, deci, sunt aceeași persoană.

vali.gazzaev
vali.gazzaev  •  22 Februarie 2021, 16:39
Respect Raportează Răspunde

steaua-cerere-de-avizare-nesemnata de ministru.jpg

octavianus
octavianus  •  22 Februarie 2021, 16:25
Respect Raportează Răspunde

Eu asa stiu si asa cred ca ar trebui sa fie, o singura Steaua pe Ghencea, un singur Rapid pe Giulesti, o singura Craiova in banie...etc O SINGURA ROMANIE, din 89 incoace numai asta am vazut dezbinare, distrugere, cine oare are de castigat din asta ?

utilizator șters
utilizator șters  •  22 Februarie 2021, 16:14
Respect Raportează Răspunde
Postat de xclx pe 22 Februarie 2021, 16:08

Cum sa piarda ceva ce nu au?:))))

scuze ..ai dreptate ..am vrut sa spun procesul cu palmaresul ..da din viteza ...!!

utilizator șters
utilizator șters  •  22 Februarie 2021, 16:14
Respect Raportează Răspunde
Postat de utilizator șters pe 22 Februarie 2021, 16:12

HAHAHA!!ia uite unde stateau nedreptatitii !!!nereptatiti ati fost si cand talpan o inregistrat ilegal marca copy/paste dupa a lui jiji ...si cand s-a facut abuzul de drept de la iccj ...sau cand madam placinta s-a pronuntat asupra palmaresului ..desi e o speta sportiva si nu civila sau penala !!ati avut noroc cu oprea care v-o ajutat cu ''nedreptatile'' astea ..da acum s-a terminat!!

Înțeleg că ești din grupul menționat. Mulțumesc pt confirmare.

vali.gazzaev
vali.gazzaev  •  22 Februarie 2021, 16:12
Respect Raportează Răspunde
Postat de vali.gazzaev pe 22 Februarie 2021, 16:10

According to the court, Becali’s registration of the Steaua brand in 2004, shortly after he gained a controlling stake, was illegal. Accordingly, every symbol relating to the club’s image was duly revoked from his organisation. The Steaua name and logo belonged to the army, not to Becali, as crisis reigned. Steaua, or perhaps more accurately Not Steaua, was forced to play their next home game, against CSM Studențesc Iași, without any visible branding as it pertained to the army’s possession. The scoreboard showed a black box where the logo usually resided, while the word Steaua was replaced with “hosts,” a generic identity of stunning emotion. Steaua Bucharest, once the champions of Europe, had lost its distinguishing features.

Sursa: ryanferguson.co.uk, un blog foarte citit de microbistii din albion Concluzia e foarte simpla: Toata Europa, toata lumea, toata omenirea, a auzit si inteles ca fc fcsb nu e Steaua. Singurii care nu se impaca cu acest adevar incontestabil sunt fecesebistii. Lesne de inteles de ce.

adook
adook  •  22 Februarie 2021, 16:11
Respect Raportează Răspunde
Postat de steauaeuna pe 22 Februarie 2021, 16:09

fixer, iar esti prost. prost rau rau de tot...tu citesti ce scri? Ia asculta:FCSB ESTE FOTBAL CLUB STEAUA BUCURESTI, STEAUA CEA ADEVARATA, STEAUA DIN LIGA 1. LIGA INTAI.Acum ai inteles? Bravo. Sezi.

valentinn cap de minge bun venit!

vali.gazzaev
vali.gazzaev  •  22 Februarie 2021, 16:10
Respect Raportează Răspunde
Postat de vali.gazzaev pe 22 Februarie 2021, 16:09

Why Steaua Bucharest lost its name and logo In 2011, Becali clashed with the army regarding exorbitant rent he was forced to pay at the dilapidated Ghencea Stadium. Perhaps in retaliation, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) asked Becali to produce documentation proving his ownership of Steaua and its associated imagery. When no paperwork was forthcoming, the MoD sued FC Steaua București, claiming that the Romanian Army was the rightful owner of the Steaua logo, colours, name and honours. “I will give the team a new name,” Becali declared as turmoil engulfed his crumbling empire. “Let’s see who the fans will support: me or the general’s team? There are many people who are my fans, not Steaua’s. They support Steaua because of me. I will change the badge and the colours. I will leave the stadium. I will do whatever they want because I’m too strong for them.” In reality, Steaua supporters were stuck in the middle of a bitter struggle for legitimacy. They were kept in the dark, starved of accurate information as to what was happening to their beloved club. At once deluded, Becali was also defeated after a protracted legal squabble. In December 2014, the Supreme Court found in the army’s favour, stripping Becali’s club of its recognisable identity.

According to the court, Becali’s registration of the Steaua brand in 2004, shortly after he gained a controlling stake, was illegal. Accordingly, every symbol relating to the club’s image was duly revoked from his organisation. The Steaua name and logo belonged to the army, not to Becali, as crisis reigned. Steaua, or perhaps more accurately Not Steaua, was forced to play their next home game, against CSM Studențesc Iași, without any visible branding as it pertained to the army’s possession. The scoreboard showed a black box where the logo usually resided, while the word Steaua was replaced with “hosts,” a generic identity of stunning emotion. Steaua Bucharest, once the champions of Europe, had lost its distinguishing features.

vali.gazzaev
vali.gazzaev  •  22 Februarie 2021, 16:09
Respect Raportează Răspunde
Postat de vali.gazzaev pe 22 Februarie 2021, 16:08

How Gigi Becali destroyed Steaua Bucharest A childhood supporter of Dinamo Bucharest, the sworn enemy of Steaua, Becali built great personal wealth in real estate, often drawing suspicion for unconventional deals. One transaction in particular led to his downfall, a sale of land to the Romanian army deemed illegal because he didn’t actually own the plot initially. In 2013, Becali was handed a three-year suspended prison sentence for his role in the plot, but one in a string of controversies that engulfed the oligarch. Indeed, under his command, Steaua became mired in criminality. Becali was also implicated in a bribery case when five of his associates were caught carrying a suitcase stuffed with cash, supposedly earmarked as a match-fixing bounty. Mihai Stoica, the club’s general manager, was arrested on suspicion of fraud and money laundering while Gheorghe Mustață, leader of a prominent Steaua ultras group, was held in connection with a murder. Becali didn’t so much want Steaua to maintain its illustrious history as to bring it under his umbrella of greedy narcissism. A deeply religious Orthodox Christian, Becali owns a replica of Leonardo da Vinci’s The Last Supper painting, although Gigi himself is depicted as Jesus Christ. Humble, eh?

Why Steaua Bucharest lost its name and logo In 2011, Becali clashed with the army regarding exorbitant rent he was forced to pay at the dilapidated Ghencea Stadium. Perhaps in retaliation, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) asked Becali to produce documentation proving his ownership of Steaua and its associated imagery. When no paperwork was forthcoming, the MoD sued FC Steaua București, claiming that the Romanian Army was the rightful owner of the Steaua logo, colours, name and honours. “I will give the team a new name,” Becali declared as turmoil engulfed his crumbling empire. “Let’s see who the fans will support: me or the general’s team? There are many people who are my fans, not Steaua’s. They support Steaua because of me. I will change the badge and the colours. I will leave the stadium. I will do whatever they want because I’m too strong for them.” In reality, Steaua supporters were stuck in the middle of a bitter struggle for legitimacy. They were kept in the dark, starved of accurate information as to what was happening to their beloved club. At once deluded, Becali was also defeated after a protracted legal squabble. In December 2014, the Supreme Court found in the army’s favour, stripping Becali’s club of its recognisable identity.

vali.gazzaev
vali.gazzaev  •  22 Februarie 2021, 16:08
Respect Raportează Răspunde

How Gigi Becali destroyed Steaua Bucharest A childhood supporter of Dinamo Bucharest, the sworn enemy of Steaua, Becali built great personal wealth in real estate, often drawing suspicion for unconventional deals. One transaction in particular led to his downfall, a sale of land to the Romanian army deemed illegal because he didn’t actually own the plot initially. In 2013, Becali was handed a three-year suspended prison sentence for his role in the plot, but one in a string of controversies that engulfed the oligarch. Indeed, under his command, Steaua became mired in criminality. Becali was also implicated in a bribery case when five of his associates were caught carrying a suitcase stuffed with cash, supposedly earmarked as a match-fixing bounty. Mihai Stoica, the club’s general manager, was arrested on suspicion of fraud and money laundering while Gheorghe Mustață, leader of a prominent Steaua ultras group, was held in connection with a murder. Becali didn’t so much want Steaua to maintain its illustrious history as to bring it under his umbrella of greedy narcissism. A deeply religious Orthodox Christian, Becali owns a replica of Leonardo da Vinci’s The Last Supper painting, although Gigi himself is depicted as Jesus Christ. Humble, eh?

  • 1
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
Comentează